Evidence standards
Make the strength of the claim visible.
A plausible method, a publisher announcement and a reproduced result are different kinds of evidence.
Proposed worksheet
An editorial method or acceptance recipe. It has not been independently tested merely because it is written clearly.
Publisher claim
A statement from a vendor or author. Link the exact source and inspection date when claiming it was checked.
Implementation corroboration
A source claim checked against related code or documentation. Same-publisher corroboration is not independent testing.
Executed local check
A bounded run with preserved inputs, commands and results. Its conclusion applies to that test, not every deployment.
Observed customer outcome
A real outcome measured in the user’s workflow. Do not infer it from unit tests, synthetic examples or reported interest.
Unavailable
A required check could not be completed. State the missing evidence without treating it as success or a demonstrated defect.
What this candidate establishes
The site content is readable and the release can be checked as a static website. No published worksheet is presented as a controlled agent trial, certified guard, supported installation or demonstrated saving.
Corrections and versions
Preserve stable identifiers and record material corrections rather than silently changing a conclusion. A revision timestamp is not a publication date. A newly rebuilt sample must not be presented as the exact historical issue.